The role of the Troika on the Greek central government accounting reforms: The reprioritization riddle Hot
https://psaar.net/media/reviews/photos/thumbnail/300x250s/1b/51/9f/international-journal-of-Public-Sector-management-7-1525786915.gif
Uploaded by Sotirios Karatzimas
Uploaded date: June 09, 2016
2941
Publication date
May 07, 2018
Author(s)
Paper language
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to explore the role of the Troika’s advent played in the progress of the budgeting and the financial reporting systems reform at the Greek central government level.
Design/methodology/approach
The approach of an extreme country case study is adopted. The data used in the paper have been identified through document analysis performed on the relevant documents produced by the Troika, the Greek Ministry of Finance, and other relevant sources. The reform process is seen through the lens of the neo-institutional theory and the resource dependency theory.
Findings
Although both reforms targeted the introduction of best international practices – particularly useful in periods of financial distress and scarce resources – the advent of the Troika affected their progress and changed the priorities. As a result, the reform was redirected toward strengthening the cash budgeting system.
Research limitations/implications
The study is subject to the limitations of an extreme case study research.
Practical implications
This is a case where resource dependency changes political priorities and directions and affects the evolvement of state budget and accounting reforms under way.
Originality/value
The role of external fund providers in public sector financial management reform priority-setting, in the case of a developed Eurozone country, is analyzed. The study contributes to the research agenda on accounting practices in times of austerity.
The purpose of this paper is to explore the role of the Troika’s advent played in the progress of the budgeting and the financial reporting systems reform at the Greek central government level.
Design/methodology/approach
The approach of an extreme country case study is adopted. The data used in the paper have been identified through document analysis performed on the relevant documents produced by the Troika, the Greek Ministry of Finance, and other relevant sources. The reform process is seen through the lens of the neo-institutional theory and the resource dependency theory.
Findings
Although both reforms targeted the introduction of best international practices – particularly useful in periods of financial distress and scarce resources – the advent of the Troika affected their progress and changed the priorities. As a result, the reform was redirected toward strengthening the cash budgeting system.
Research limitations/implications
The study is subject to the limitations of an extreme case study research.
Practical implications
This is a case where resource dependency changes political priorities and directions and affects the evolvement of state budget and accounting reforms under way.
Originality/value
The role of external fund providers in public sector financial management reform priority-setting, in the case of a developed Eurozone country, is analyzed. The study contributes to the research agenda on accounting practices in times of austerity.
Preferred Citation
Sandra Cohen, Sotirios Karatzimas, (2018) "The role of the Troika on the Greek central government accounting reforms: The reprioritization riddle", International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 31 Issue: 3, pp.316-330, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-06-2016-0101
Keywords
Greece; Financial crisis; Public sector accounting; Resource dependency theory; Accounting reforms; The Troika
Category
- Financial accounting
- Other
Type of Paper
Published paper
How to get the paper
From the journal