: Implementing Performance Reporting in Local Government: a Cross-Country Comparison Hot
https://psaar.net/media/reviews/photos/thumbnail/300x250s/f3/41/64/PUBLIC-PERFORMANCE-AND-MANAGEMENT-REVIEW-27-1463642681.jpg
Uploaded by Isabel Brusca
Uploaded date: May 18, 2016
2455
Publication date
March 23, 2016
Author(s)
Paper language
Abstract
Providing information on economy, efficiency, and effectiveness is one of the most important innovations in local government management, with performance reporting emerging as a new component for accountability and decision-making. This article compares 17 countries to ascertain whether there is convergence between them, studying key issues in the implementation of performance reporting by local governments. It also identifies some lessons that can be of use to countries that want to implement or improve performance reporting systems. Findings show that there is no convergence in practice or results, and that institutional factors influence the implementation of performance reporting; in many countries, performance reporting has been introduced by central and regional governments as a mechanism to control local government activities in order to enhance performance. Austerity has underlined the importance of performance information, especially in Southern European countries, but more must be done before the full impact of performance reporting can be achieved.
Preferred Citation
Brusca , I. and Montesinos, V. (2016) Implementing Performance Reporting in Local Government: A Cross-Countries Comparison. Public Performance & Management Review, Vol. 39, Iss. 3, pp.
Keywords
performance reporting, local government, international comparison, accountability
Email
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Category
Performance measurement
Type of Paper
Published paper